BRUNSWICK CITY PLANNING COMMISSION
January 22, 2026 - Caucus
6:41 p.m.
Attendance:
Joe Shirilla, Chairman
Brad Saeger, Vice-Chairman
Jeff Arona, Member
Abbas Hasan, Member
John Rocha, Secretary
Joe Delsanter, Council Representative
Jennie Lods, Planning and Zoning Coordinator
Santo Incorvaia, Assistant Law Director
Grant Aungst, Community and Economic Development Director
John W. Tesar, 4194 Keller Hanna Drive
Karen M. Howell, 3992 Buckingham Drive
John Calabrese, 4223 Keller Hannah
Mike Yasenchak, 4213 Keller Hanna
Cory Hedburg, 31913 Lake Road
Kevin McNulty, Westway Drive
Greg Seifert, 3390 Verner
Michael Tinter, Innovative Products, WebEx
Kevin Broka, 2211 Medina Road
Tom Ludwig, 1310 Sharon Copley Road
Ryan Tebeau, WebEx
John Hanks, WebEx
Chairman Shirilla called the meeting to order at 6:41 p.m.
The first item was Magnetic Mic
(Public hearing-conditional zoning certificate)
Location: 2844 Westway Drive
Mr. Aungst said this is a new tenant in the building and it’s a unique item that they have
developed over the years.
The second item was The Villas on Pearl (former Provision Living)
(Public hearing — zoning, conceptual plan and development guidelines)
Location: 953 Pearl Road, south of St. Ambrose Church
Mr. Aungst stated the things that they have done since the last time they were at
Planning Commission. He briefly went over the past project and the current project.
Mr. Aungst talked about the water being controlled with this project. Vice-Chair Saeger
asked if at this point, they are using the old SPD-5 guidelines or have they been
updated and it was answered by Mr. Aungst that they have been updated.
The third item was Westway Small Business Park
(Public hearing — conditional zoning certificate and detailed site plan)
Location: 2964 Westway Drive
Mr. Aungst said they are at Planning Commission to approve the warehousing that this
business has.
There were no comments from the Commission.
Chairman Shirilla adjourned the meeting at 6:47 p.m.
Respectfully,
Sprws Red
*Tennie Lods
BRUNSWICK CITY PLANNING COMMISSION
January 22, 2026
6:59 p.m.
Attendance:
Joe Shirilla, Chairman f
Brad Saeger, Vice-Chairman i
Abbas Hasan, member '
Jeff Arona, Member
John Rocha, Secretary ’
Joe Delsanter, Council Representative Z
Jennie Lods, Planning and Zoning Coordinator ;
Santo Incorvaia, Assistant Law Director f
Grant Aungst, Community and Economic Development Director
John W. Tesar, 4194 Keller Hanna Drive ?
Karen M. Howell, 3992 Buckingham Drive i
John Calabrese, 4223 Keller Hannah f
Mike Yasenchak, 4213 Keller Hanna é
Cory Hedburg, 31913 Lake Road
Kevin McNulty, Westway Drive
Greg Seifert, 3390 Verner
Michael Tinter, Innovative Products, WebEx
Kevin Broka, 2211 Medina Road
Tom Ludwig, 1310 Sharon Copley Road
Ryan Tebeau, WebEx
John Hanks, WebEx
22 Li ss ee eee
fale
EL a ea ee
Tae ae alee a a” ee
item 1 i
Chairman Shirilla called the meeting to order at 6:59 p.m.
Miss Lods called the roll: 5 Present, 0 Absent
Item 2 F
MR. HASAN MADE A MOTION TO NOMINATE MR. JOHN ROCHA FOR
SECRETARY, VICE-CHAIR SAEGER SECONDED THE MOTION. THERE WERE NO
OTHER NOMINATIONS.
MOTION PASSED, 5 AYES, 0 NAYS.
So See ees eS =
CHAIR SHIRILLA MADE A MOTION TO NOMINATE MR. HASAN FO VICE-CHAIR,
MR. HASAN NOMINATED MR. SAEGER FOR VICE-CHAIR, MR. HASAN REJECTED
THE NOMINATION. MR. ARONA SECONDED THE MOTION. VICE-CHAIR SAEGER
ACCEPTED THE NOMINATION. THERE WERE NO OTHER NOMINATIONS.
MOTION PASSED, 5 AYES, 0 NAYS.
haha
:
Brunswick City Planning Commission
01-22-2026 Minutes
MR. ROCHA MADE A MOTION TO NOMINATE CHAIR SHIRILLA TO CONTINUE AS
CHAIR, VICE-CHAIR SAEGER SECONDED THE MOTION. CHAIR SHIRILLA
ACCEPTED THE NOMINATION. THERE WERE NO OTHER NOMINATIONS.
MOTION PASSED, 5 AYES, 0 NAYS.
item 3
Announcements or Correspondence. There were none.
tem 4
Approval of December 4, 2025 minutes.
MR. ROCHA MOTIONED TO APPROVE THE MINUTES FROM DECEMBER 4, 2025.
Vice-Chair Saeger seconded.
5 Ayes, 0 Nays
Item 5 (a)
Magnetic Mic
(Public hearing — conditional zoning certificate)
Location: 2844 Westway Drive, Brunswick, Ohio.
I-L District
Regarding the Public hearing and conditional zoning certificate, Michael Tinter, the CBO
of Innovative Products and Greg Seifert were present. Mr. Tinter talked about the
project and what type of products they make for first responders. They currently supply
the Brunswick Police Department with their product. Chair Shirilla asked Mr. Aungst
about their hours and when trucks could deliver products. Mr. Tinter answered they
work from 8:00 a.m. to 4:30 p.m. which is different than the hours that were listed on the
conditional zoning certificate. It was discussed amongst the Planning Commission to
change the hours on the conditional zoning certificate but the applicant requested to
keep the current hours that were listed to allow for overtime. There will be no need to
change the conditional zoning certificate.
Public Hearing was opened at 7:10 p.m.
No one spoke for the public hearing.
Public Hearing was closed at 7:10 p.m.
Staff Review Comments:
1. is any outdoor storage proposed; if so, it shall be designated on a site plan which
must be approved by the Planning Commission, pursuant to Section 1266.06.
There will be no outdoor storage per the applicant.
2. Performance Standards shall be submitted, in accordance with Section 1266.07,
regarding noise, glare, electromagnetic interference, vibration, odor and
hazardous materials. The applicant will comply.
2
Brunswick City Planning Commission
01-22-2026 Minutes
3. If a dumpster is being used, provide the location on the site plan. The applicant
will provide the dumpster on the site plan and it will be on the southwest
corner of the building on a concrete pad.
4. All requirements shall be adhered to on the conditional zoning certificate. The
applicant will comply.
Staff Recommendations:
Staff recommends approval of the conditional zoning certificate, provided the above
items are addressed.
There were no further discussions from the Commission.
MR. HASAN MADE A MOTION TO APPROVE THE CONDITIONAL ZONING
CERTIFICATE FOR MAGNETIC MIC, 2844 WESTWAY DRIVE, BRUNSWICK, OHIO
WITH THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS: THE APPLICANT WILL SUBMIT
PERFORMANCE STANDARDS IN ACCORDANCE WITH SECTION 1266.06 AS
LISTED. THE APPLICANT WILL NOT BE ADDING A SECOND DUMPSTER. ALL
CONDITIONS ON THE CONDITIONAL ZONING CERTIFICATE SHALL BE ADHERED
TO.
Mr. Arona seconded.
5 Ayes, 0 Nays
Item 5 (b)
The Villas on Pearl (former Provision Living)
(Public hearing — zoning, conceptual plan and development guidelines)
Location: 953 Pearl Road, south of St. Ambrose Church, Brunswick, Ohio.
SPD-5
Regarding the public hearing, rezoning, conceptual plan and development guidelines,
Kevin Broka was present and Ryan Tebeau was present via WebEx. Mr. Broka went
over all the changes that were made to the site plan since the last meeting. Mr. Tebeau
was displaying slides on the screen via WebEx. He talked about unimpeded traffic
through the development from the school busses and trash pickup vehicles, etc. Mr.
Broka talked about the integrated sidewalks are better for the residents. He explained
that a rolled curb would not work with the integrated sidewalks. Mr. Aungst stated that
he does not believe there was a formal vote to make this an SPD because it needs to
have a public hearing which is why it is a public hearing this evening.
Chairman Shirilla went over the staff review comments:
Regarding staff review comment number 1 pertaining to Section 1268.07(c) and (d), the
applicant acknowledged. Regarding number 2 pertaining to the traffic study, Mr. Broka
3
Brunswick City Planning Commission
01-22-2026 Minutes
stated that a new traffic study is not needed. Ms. Zoldak stated that she would like this
in a full report to be reviewed. Mr. Arona talked about trip generation and said that the
previous report with the previous project could possibly project that trip counts could be
different. Mr. Broka said he would be happy to update the traffic study. Regarding staff
review comment number 3 regarding 5’ wide sidewalks, the applicant will comply. Staff
review comment number 4 regarding curbs shall be rolled, Ms. Zoldak would like to
address this during the engineering review. While she understands that having the 6’
curb provides pedestrians more safety, she also understands that it could potentially be
a danger to residents in wheelchairs and that use walkers. She would like to discuss
this during the engineering review. Mr. Arona wanted to know what the speed limit on
the streets would be and Mr. Broka answered they would be 12 miles per hour. The
Planning Commission is okay with letting engineering review the curbs. Mr. Arona
wanted to make sure that the color of the sidewalk would be darker to separate it from
the street if they do not roll the curbs. Mr. Broka said they would either color it darker or
stripe them with paint. Mr. Arona has a preference to make the sidewalk darker in color.
There was a discussion between members about the concern with snow plows and it
was stated that the sidewalks would intentionally be plowed along with the streets.
Chair Shirilla asked about marked crosswalks and Ms. Zoldak said she sees several on
the site plan. The applicant confirmed they will be striped. Regarding staff review
comment number 5 in regards to the pond. The applicant has agreed to use aeration
and it will be lighted but it is still being decided on if it will be stocked with fish. The
applicant acknowledges that site plan approval is required following City Council
approval.
Mr. Hasan is concerned with the density and that is the only thing that makes him
hesitant to approve this. Mr. Aungst said to keep in mind that they have met all the
requirements within the guidelines.
The public hearing was opened at 8:09 p.m.
Karen Howell at 3992 Buckingham Drive is concerned with the lighting issues in this
development. She is confused why there may be school busses in this neighborhood.
She looked up reviews and doesn't see it gets good reviews and wanted to know if the
Planning Commission has looked into this company. She is concerned with the traffic
on Buckingham Drive. She stated her road hasn't been paved in over 35 years and
what is the city planning to do about that. It was concluded that Buckingham Drive is
not a part of this development so she can address some of her issues with Mr.
Delsanter after the meeting.
Public hearing was closed at 8:13 p.m.
The applicant and the Planning Commission addressed some of the Ms. Howell’s
concerns. Regarding the school busses, Chair Shirilla said there may be some kids that
live in that development with grandparents, etc. Chair Shirilla was happy they made a
turn-around for the larger vehicles. Mr. Broka talked about the lighting and stated that
there are limits to how high the lights can be and they will submit a photometric plan to
4
Brunswick City Planning Commission
01-22-2026 Minutes
administration for review. Regarding the company’s reputation, none of the projects
that they manage have bad reviews. He offered to talk to the resident on where she
may have found this information. Chrissy listed all the companies that they manage for
the resident. Mr. Aungst stated that this company has a long history of people care.
Mr. Aungst stated that it is a federal law that we have to allow up to 20 percent of under
55 years old to live there in a senior development. Chair Shirilla feels that they do fulfill
the makeup of an SPD. Vice-Chair Saeger is not in favor of making this an SPD but
after reading the guidelines he feels that it would benefit the city to make it an SPD
versus what could potentially go in there. Mr. Hasan said we have seen a ton of
different site plans for this area over so many years that have not worked out and feels
that this plan actually works.
Chair Shirilla asked Mr. Incorvaia if they could put a motion on the floor to vote on the
merits of an SPD and recommend to City Council and wanted to know if they would also
vote on the conceptual plan and development guidelines. Mr. Incorvaia answered that
yes, they could put it all in one vote.
The Planning Commission moved onto the design guidelines. Mr. Hasan wanted
something clarified on page 6 regarding (h) recreation space, he would like it clarified
that the 2,500 sq. ft. is for the clubhouse and not for all the amenities. He feels that it is
confusing.
Mr. Delsanter wanted to know if there have ever been any incidents with people being
hit in some of their other developments with not having curbs. Mr. Broka answered no,
but there have been issues with residents falling off the curbs when they have curbs.
Staff Review Comments:
1. Pursuant to Section 1268.07(c) and (d), respectively, changes to the conceptual
development plan of more than a cosmetic nature shail also be approved by City
Council by ordinance. Additionally, once a Special Planning District is created, it
may only be changed through the Charter provisions for zoning amendments.
The applicant acknowledges.
2. The traffic study shall be updated. The applicant has agreed to provide this.
3. A minimum 5’ wide sidewalk shall be installed for pedestrian access. The
applicant will comply.
4. Street curbs shall be rolled, instead of unrolled, per the City Engineer’s
recommendation. The applicant has decided to not have curbs that are
rolled and the engineer has agreed to review this during her final site plan
review. She understands the safety concern with having curbs and is
willing to consider approving no curbs after her review.
Brunswick City Planning Commission
01-22-2026 Minutes
5. Consider aeration and possible lighting to the pond, as it will be stocked with fish.
The applicant has agreed to aeration and lighting to the pond but is not
sure it will be stocked with fish, although they would like to.
6. Detailed site plan approval is required following City Council approval. The
applicant acknowledges.
Staff Recommendations:
Staff recommends approval to City Council of the existing SPD-5 zoning, conceptual!
plan and development guidelines.
There were no further discussions from the Commission.
MR. HASAN MADE A MOTION TO RECOMMEND APPROVAL TO CITY COUNCIL
FOR THE VILLAS ON PEARL (FORMER PROVISION LIVING) EXISITING SPD-5
ZONING, CONCEPTUAL PLAN AND DEVELOPMENT GUIDELINES, 953 PEARL
ROAD, SOUTH OF ST. AMBROSE CHURCH, BRUNSWICK, OHIO WITH THE
FOLLOWING COMMENTS: UNDER 1 IN THE BUILDING DESIGN STANDARDS OF
THE GUIDELINES, THE APPLICANT SHALL ADD VERBIAGE THAT THE FACADE
OF AN INDIVIDUAL UNIT WILL NOT BE THE EXACT FACADE TO THE UNIT
ADJACENT TO IT. THE RECREATION SPACE SECTION WILL BE CLARIFIED THAT
THE RECREATION CLUBHOUSE WILL BE A MINIMUM OF 2500 SQ. FT.
REGARDING STAFF REVIEW COMMENTS NUMBER 2 THROUGH 5, THOSE WILL
BE ADDRESSED DURING THE FINAL SITE PLAN APPROVAL. MR. INCORVAIA
READ THE OBJECTIVES OF AN SPD OUT LOUD FROM THE CODE. MR. HASAN
FOUND THAT THE SPD MEETS THE OBJECTIVES OF SECTION 1268.01 AND
1268.05(c)(3).
Mr. Rocha seconded.
5 Ayes, 0 Nays
Item 5 (c)
Westway Small Business Park
(Public hearing — conditional zoning certificate and detailed site plan)
Location: 2964 Westway Drive
\-L District
Regarding the conditional zoning certificate and detailed site plan review, Kevin McNulty
the owner and Cory Hedburg of Alber and Rice were present. Mr. McNulty talked about
the project with the Planning Commission. He feels that small businesses need a place
to call home versus working out of their homes. Mr. McNulty talked about wanting to
light up the Brunswick Sign for the city. Chair Shirilla wanted to know if the retention
basins were wet or dry and Mr. Hedburg confirmed they were wet. It was confirmed that
there would be double staggered pine trees of two rows and that would need to be
shown on the detailed site plan for administrative approval. Mr. Hasan wanted
clarification on the grass pavers that wrap around the building and wanted to know what
6
Brunswick City Planning Commission
01-22-2026 Minutes
the rational was for that. Mr. McNulty said that was for the fire department to be able to
get around to the fire hydrants. Mr. Arona wanted to know what they did with unit 20 and
Mr. McNulty stated that there were originally 2 units there and when they revised the
plan, they moved one building and eliminated one. They will still be using the 36’
variance that was approved at the previous Planning Commission meeting. Mr. Arona
wanted to know if the names of the businesses would be on the entry doors. Mr.
McNulty said the doors would be numbered and the names would be put on an
entrance sign. Mr. Aungst addressed one of Chair Shirillas concems that there could
be no retail at this location. There also could not be any labs. Mr. McNulty said that
each unit will have 2 parking spaces. Staff review comments were addressed and the
applicant will comply to all 3. Mr. Delsanter wanted to know if there were going to be
delivery problems with businesses that may not be open every day. Mr. McNulty said
he used to work for UPS and usually businesses require deliveries during certain time
frames.
Public hearing was opened at 9:10 p.m.
There were no comments.
Public hearing was closed at 9:10 p.m.
Staff Review Comments:
1. On the landscape plan, pursuant to Section 1282.06(b), indicate a double
staggered row of 6’ high pine trees will be planted in the 50’ screening yard
adjacent to the residential district. The applicant will comply.
2. All requirements shail be adhered to on the conditional zoning certificate. The
applicant will comply.
3. Final site plan approval is subject to engineering approval. The applicant
acknowledges.
Staff Recommendations:
Staff recommends approval of the conditional zoning certificate and detailed site plan,
provided the above items are addressed.
There were no further discussions from the Commission.
VICE-CHAIR SAEGER MADE A MOTION TO APPROVE THE CONDITIONAL ZONING
CERTIFICATE AND DETAILED SITE PLAN FOR WESTWAY SMALL BUSINESS
PARK, 2964 WESTWAY DRIVE, BRUNSWICK, OHIO WITH THE FOLLOWING
COMMENTS: THE APPLICANT HAS AGREED TO PROVIDE A DOUBLE ROW OF
STAGGERED PINE TREES THAT ARE 6’ IN HEIGHT. ALL REQUIREMENTS SHALL
BE ADHERED TO ON THE CONDITIONAL ZONING CERTIFICATE AND FINAL SITE
PLAN APPROVAL IS SUBJECT TO ENGINEERING APPROVAL.
Mr. Arona seconded.
Brunswick City Planning Commission
01-22-2026 Minutes
5 Ayes, 0 Nays
Item 6
Old Business — There was no old business.
Item 7
New business — Reappointment of Jonn Rocha to the CRA Brunswick Housing Council
Chair Shirilla made a motion to reappoint Mr. John Rocha to the CRA Brunswick
Housing Council,
Vice-Chair Saeger seconded.
Motion passed, 5 Ayes, 0 Nays.
Stone Creek walking path removal, home occupation (bakery) and code review are all
on the February 5, 2026 agenda.
Item 8
Public Comment Period — No public comments.
Item 9
Council Representative’s Report — Mr. Delsanter talked about how he spoke with
outside members regarding SPD’s and they stated they approve them very often in their
city.
MR. ROCHA MADE A MOTION TO ADJOURN
Vice-Chair Saeger seconded the motion.
The vote was 5 Ayes 0 Nays.
The meeting was adjourned at 9:20 p.m.
R tfully,
ennie Lods
PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT
January 22, 2026
Magnetic Mic (Innovative Products, Inc.)
(Public hearing — conditional zoning certificate)
Location: 2844 Westway Drive
I-L. District
Proposed Use & Background:
A conditional zoning certificate application has been submitted to occupy a 10,350 sq. ft.
tenant space located at the rear (south) portion of the 28,800 sq. ft. building owned by Nova
Electric. The tenant space will contain 3,450 sq. ft. of office/production area and 6,900 sq. ft.
of warehouse/staging/future production space.
A contractor's headquarters is a permitted use in the I-L District, pursuant to Section
1266.02(c) of the Zoning Code. This facility will also contain warehouse space, which is a
conditionally permitted use, in accordance with Section 1266.04(h), provided it is accessory
to and necessary for the support of a principally or conditionally permitted use.
Magnetic Mic is a product used on mobile communications equipment, such as first
responders, the construction industry and freight logistics services. Hours of operation are
from approximately 7:00 a.m. until 6:00 p.m. Monday through Friday. There will be eight
employees.
As part of the Nova Electric detailed site plan approval on March 20, 2025, thirty-five parking
spaces and two handicap spaces were approved. As future tenants are still being
determined, the number of parking spaces may fluctuate; therefore, land-banked
parking/loading areas, along with overhead doors on the west side of the facility, were also
approved.
No changes are proposed to the exterior of the building, other than signage, which will be
submitted to the Division of Building at a later date.
Staff Review Comments:
1. Is any outdoor storage proposed; if so, it shall be designated on a site plan which must
be approved by the Planning Commission, pursuant to Section 1266.06.
2. Performance Standards shall be submitted, in accordance with Section 1266.07,
regarding noise, glare, electromagnetic interference, vibration, odor and hazardous
materials.
3. \f a dumpster is being used, provide the location on the site plan.
Planning Commission Staff Report
January 22, 2026
4. All requirements shall be adhered to on the conditional zoning certificate.
Staff Recommendations:
Staff recommends approval of the conditional zoning certificate, provided the above items are
addressed.
RICO
(Public hearing — conditional zoning certificate)
Location: 2925 Interstate Parkway
I-L District
Proposed Use & Background:
A conditional zoning certificate application has been submitted to perform light manufacturing
in the form of pre-assembly of new lift truck components at an existing 6,250 sq. ft. building.
Hours of operation will be Monday through Thursday from 6:00 a.m. until 4:30 p.m., with
overtime on Friday, if necessary.
Light manufacturing is a permitted use in the I-L District, pursuant to Section 1266.02(a) of
the Zoning Code. This facility will also contain warehouse space, which is a conditionally
permitted use, in accordance with Section 1266.04(h), provided it is accessory to and
necessary for the support of a principally or conditionally permitted use.
In accordance with Section 1266.07, the applicant has stated there will be no glare, vibration,
dust, fumes or odors beyond typical industrial levels, and the facility shall be in compliance
with all applicable building, fire and safety codes.
There is sufficient parking on the site for the six full-time employees, along with 25% for
guests, company vehicles and employment growth, in compliance with Table 1276-1(e).
There is one van-accessible handicap space on the site, as required by Section 1106.6 of the
2024 Ohio Building Code. No changes to the site or exterior of the building are proposed and
there will be no outdoor storage or new signage.
Staff Review Comments:
1. All requirements shall be adhered to on the conditional zoning certificate.
Staff Recommendations:
Staff recommends approval of the conditional zoning certificate, provided the above item is
addressed.
Planning Commission Staff Report
January 22, 2026
The Villas on Pearl (former Provision Living)
(Public hearing — zoning, conceptual plan and development guidelines)
Location: 953 Pearl Road, south of St. Ambrose Church
SPD-5
Proposed Use & Background:
The Planning Commission, at their meeting on November 20, 2025, moved the revised
discussion plan to a public hearing to maintain the existing SPD-5 zoning and approve the
conceptual plan and development guidelines to construct 18 buildings with a total of 86 units
on 16.2 acres consisting of Permanent Parcel Nos. 003-18B-31-539 and 003-18B-31-540,
with a maximum density of 5.31 dwelling units per acre, in accordance with Section 5(d) of
the Development Guidelines.
A portion of the Staff Review Comments from the November 20" meeting have been
addressed as follows:
1. Section 1(a) of the Development Guidelines will guarantee that 80% of the units will be
for age 55 and older, which will be stated in the lease agreement in order to be
consistent with the purpose of the active senior development.
2. The Commission determined at the above meeting that the purpose and objectives of
a Special Planning District have been met, in accordance with Section 1268.01 and
Section 1268.05(c), respectively, of the Zoning Code.
3. A turnaround has been provided on the east side of the development for non-
emergency vehicles.
4. The Planning Commission agreed the proposed density of 5.31 dwelling units per acre
is acceptable.
5. As required by Section 1282.09, the applicant stated all utilities will be screened from
view and shall be located within the rear one-third of the buildings.
6. A Vehicle Tracking Plan has been submitted indicating the traffic pattern for
emergency vehicle access, school buses, and garbage/delivery trucks.
7. Wetland impact documentation has been submitted to the Army Corps of Engineers
and the applicant is waiting for a response.
Staff Review Comments:
1. Pursuant to Section 1268.07(c) and (d), respectively, changes to the conceptual
development plan of more than a cosmetic nature shall also be approved by City
Council by ordinance. Additionally, once a Special Planning District is created, it may
only be changed through the Charter provisions for zoning amendments.
Planning Commission Staff Report
January 22, 2026
2. The traffic study shall be updated.
3. A minimum 5’ wide sidewalk shall be installed for pedestrian access.
4. Street curbs shall be rolled, instead of unrolled, per the City Engineer's
recommendation.
5. Consider aeration and possible lighting to the pond, as it will be stocked with fish.
6. Detailed site plan approval is required following City Council approval.
Staff Recommendations:
Staff recommends approval to City Council of the existing SPD-5 zoning, conceptual plan and
development guidelines.
Westway Small Business Park
(Public hearing — conditional zoning certificate and detailed site plan)
Location: 2964 Westway Drive
I-L District
Proposed Use & Background:
A conditional zoning certificate application and revised detailed site plan have been submitted
to construct two buildings consisting of contractor tenant suites: the larger 36,345 sq. ft.
building located closest to Westway Drive will house Suites 1 through 18, and the 19,312 sq.
ft., structure near the east property line will contain Suites 19 through 29, for a total square
footage of 55,657 sq. ft.
A contractor's headquarters is a permitted use in the I-L District, pursuant to Section
1266.02(c) of the Zoning Code. This facility will also contain warehouse space, which is a
conditionally permitted use, in accordance with Section 1266.04(h), provided it is accessory
to and necessary for the support of a principally or conditionally permitted use.
A majority of the Staff Review Comments from the December 4" meeting have been
addressed as follows:
1. The Planning Commission, as permitted by Section 1244.04(b)({1), granted a 36’
variance to allow Unit 19 to be located 164’ from the 200’ setback required by Section
1266.05(g), as no structure shall be located within a 200’ radius of the side and rear
property lines adjacent to a residential district. Pursuant to the above section, City
Council approved the variance request at their meeting on December 15, 2025. Unit
20 has been relocated and is no longer in the 200’ setback.
2. The driveway width at the Westway Drive curb complies with Table 1276-4; however,
the width at the right-of-way is approximately 45’, which exceeds the maximum 40’
4
9.
Planning Commission Staff Report
January 22, 2026
allowed by the above Table. As permitted by Section 1276.15(b), the Planning
Commission determined a 45’ width is necessary for maneuverability on the site and
granted a modification.
Section 1282.06(b) and Section 1266.05(g) require a minimum 50 wide side and/or
rear screening yard when adjacent to a residential district; a notation is shown on the
landscape plan (Sheet AS-2) indicating this requirement has been met. Also, a
notation has been added to the landscape plan indicating 19% and 25%, respectively,
of the total front yards of both buildings has been landscaped, which meets the
minimum 5% required by Section 1282.06(f).
A photometrics plan (Sheet AS-5) indicates compliance with the maximum one (1)
footcandle lighting level adjacent to a residential district or use, pursuant to Section
1276.14(d).
A color rendering of the rear elevations has been submitted.
One van-accessible handicap parking space is included with the five regular handicap
spaces, as required by Section 1106.6 of the 2024 Ohio Building Code.
A truck turning radius exhibit (Sheet REF) has been provided to ensure there is
sufficient room for semi-trucks and emergency vehicles.
Fire hydrants have been added every 300’ from Westway Drive, per Fire Department
requirements.
Each unit have its own “all-in-one” HVAC unit near the front door.
Staff Review Comments:
1.
2.
3.
On the landscape plan, pursuant to Section 1282.06(b), indicate a double staggered
row of 6’ high pine trees will be planted in the 50’ screening yard adjacent to the
residential district.
All requirements shall be adhered to on the conditional zoning certificate.
Final site plan approval is subject to engineering approval.
Staff Recommendations:
Staff recommends approval of the conditional zoning certificate and detailed site plan,
provided the above items are addressed.