minhpd 10-27-25

1 MINUTES OF HOUSING, PLANNING, & DEVELOPMENT COMMITTEE OCTOBER 27, 2025 COUNCIL CHAMBERS Present: Chair Baker, Councilmember Bullock, Councilmember Evans Also Present: Planning Director Byington, Assistant Planning Director Baas, Law Director Vargo, Building Commissioner Parmelee, Council staff Call to Order: 7:20 p.m. Approval of the minutes of the September 8, 2025 Housing, Planning & Development Committee. Motion made and seconded to approve the minutes of the September 8, 2025 Housing, Planning Development Committee. All members in favor. Motion passed. Minutes approved. Communication from Assistant Planning Director Baas regarding Lakewood Zoning Refresh Project ( 2024- 2025) – UPDATED ( Districts and Use Standards) ( Referred to HPD 9/15/2025) Chair Baker invited Assistant Planning Director Bass to present on the status of the Lakewood Zoning Refresh Project. Assistant Director Bass began by explaining that they are on task 4 of the 7 steps outlined in the scope of work, which involves reviewing and updating the District and Use Standards of the Zoning Code. He said there are a lot of details involved in this phase, that they are about fifty percent done with the draft recommendations and are still flushing out a lot of the specifics. He said he has been sharing additional comments and questions that came out of the last Zoning Planning Advisory Committee ( ZPAC) meeting held in August with the consultant, and he encouraged Council to also share any feedback they have after the evening’ s presentation. Assistant Director Baas then highlighted the three main areas ZPAC is working through at a macro level, before going into further detail: 1.) Multi Dwelling Districts – One of the main objectives of the project is to find ways to squeeze more density into the Zoning Code that prioritizes the historical character of the code over the revisions from the 1990’ s that promoted single family dwellings. 2.) Municipal District – This is a new district born of the C4 Schools District currently in the Zoning Code, but broadened to reflect schools, parks and municipal structures and uses that could be treated as their own district. 3.) Planned Development Process – One goal is to identify efficiencies that can be squeezed out of the existing PD process, such as potentially delineating between major and minor projects. Docusign Envelope ID: FC7C8E7A- 66D0-4861-9E0B- CAD6E90E317D

2 He provided further details regarding the current districts and the proposed major changes as well as the current overlay districts compared to the proposed overlay districts. He also reviewed the proposed zoning map, with the disclaimer that it is very much a work in process and further explained some of the proposed changes. RM2 District Assistant Director Baas provided background on the reasoning behind proposing the RM2 district, explaining that the goal is to support higher levels of density near transit corridors and to promote mixed use development. He shared the different implementation options that have been discussed. He said ultimately, he thinks the route they will choose is a transit- oriented development ( TOD) overlay which will allow for flexibility. In response to a question from Councilmember Bullock, Assistant Director Baas responded that communicating changes of this nature to current residents will present challenges, but that the TOD overlay option would potentially be easier to communicate since it is less permanent. In response to comments from Councilmember Bullock about whether the planning related boards and commissions are considered “ pro-development,” Chair Baker responded that it is an ongoing tension. He said that mixed density is a current issue in Lakewood, and that the overlay option at least allows for neighborhood input. Assistant Director Baas then elaborated on the challenges of blending the use and district standards. He said the object of many of the proposed changes is to bring existing structures and uses into conformity to allow property owners to do things to code without having to go through the boards and commissions. MD – Residential District Assistant Director Baas explained they are combining the ML and MH districts into one MD District since they both have similar development patterns. He said the intention is to support multi-dwelling units that maintain the historical character of Lakewood as opposed to the gold coast towers built during the 1970’ s that require greater setbacks due to their height. M – Municipal District Assistant Director Baas explained the goal of this district is to support the expansion, renovation and adaptive reuse of municipal and district properties. He also addressed how a property becomes a municipal district property and how a property leaves the municipal district. He then reviewed various charts that compared previous and proposed dimensional and lot standards for various districts and spoke about the benefits of the proposed changes. In response to commentary from Councilmember Bullock, there was further discussion amongst the committee, Assistant Planning Director Baas and Building Commissioner Parmelee about the current issue of nonconformity and how the zoning code refresh can be a tool to help address the issue. It was agreed that the goal is to allow property owners that have a three-unit dwelling that is currently nonconforming to be able to invest in their property and maintain the three units with ease. Docusign Envelope ID: FC7C8E7A- 66D0-4861-9E0B- CAD6E90E317D

3 Assistant Director Baas elaborated on how they foresee using an overlay process and other tools to increase and introduce density in residential zoned neighborhoods where it makes sense. He reviewed the major proposed use-related changes to each of the zoning districts as well as the proposed process changes to the Planned Development ( PD) Districts. He also talked about the proposal to add items to the zoning code such as an Adaptive Reuse Overlay ( AR-O), ADU Standards, and other accessory uses that are not currently covered in the zoning code. In closing, he said the consultants have started moving on to task five which covers Development, Building and Sign Standards. In response to a question from Chair Baker, Assistant Director Baas confirmed that the City will seek to extend the moratorium on vape shops because of the ongoing work to address vape shops within the Zoning Code update. He shared the City of Akron’ s approach, which includes treating vape shops like tattoo shops and suggested that Lakewood may want to take a similar approach. Chair Baker and Councilmember Bullock expressed support for regulating vape shops. Councilmember Bullock shared his observations of deferred maintenance in Lakewood neighborhoods, concluding that residents are under financial pressures. He noted that the Zoning Code update is focused on enhancing density and questioned if this increased density will bring with it the needed price relief, and if so, how quickly. He noted that while the City has championed ADUs as one tool, they are extremely expensive to build. Assistant Director Baas acknowledged that a detached ADU is very expensive and that the most feasible option for most Lakewood homeowners is an attached third floor ADU. He noted that many of these already exist but are non-conformities under the existing Code and that the ADU ordinance has certain restrictions that can be addressed in the Zoning Code update. In response to further commentary from Councilmember Bullock, Assistant Director Baas spoke about how the Zoning Code update may activate greater creativity and potential in the City’ s Industrial District. The Committee discussed the new opportunities made available at the Screw Factory Building as a result of a recent change to the area’ s zoning. Councilmember Bullock shared ideas to maintain momentum in the area. Chair Baker concluded that he will continue to bring updates to the Council as the Zoning Code refresh project unfolds. Ultimately, Council will be presented with a large package of legislation to enact the proposed changes. Motion made by Chair Baker and seconded to receive and file the communication. All members voted in favor. Motion passed. S. ORDINANCE 18-2025 - AN ORDINANCE to take effect immediately provided it receives the affirmative vote of at least two thirds of the members of Council, or otherwise to take effect and be in force after the earliest period allowed by law, to amend Chapter 1775, Weeds, of the Codified Ordinances of the City of Lakewood for the purpose of establishing regulations for front yard plantings. ( 1st read & referred to HPD 5/19/25; 2nd reading 6/2/2025) Chair Baker stated that this item would remain on the docket for now while the committee seeks additional input from gardeners and from Keep Lakewood Beautiful. He acknowledged that the Docusign Envelope ID: FC7C8E7A- 66D0-4861-9E0B- CAD6E90E317D

4 Building Department is looking for guidance and would like to have this ordinance in place before the next growing season. He suggested that Keep Lakewood Beautiful could be helpful with the education and outreach around the new regulations. Communication from Planning Director Byington regarding Authorization to Sell Real Property Located at 1472 Belle Avenue. ( referred to HPD 10/6/25) ORDINANCE 28-2025 - AN ORDINANCE to take effect immediately provided it receives the affirmative vote of at least two thirds of the members of Council, or otherwise to take effect and be in force after the earliest period allowed by law, authorizing and directing the Director of Planning and Development or the Mayor to enter into an agreement with a licensed real estate broker to market for sale the real property located at 1472 Belle Avenue ( PPN 314-04-042) Lakewood, Ohio for a period of 180 days, pursuant to Section 155.07 of the Codified Ordinances. ( placed on 1st reading and referred to HPD 10/6/25) Noting that Ord. 28-2025 was erroneously left off the October 20th docket for second reading, Chair Baker asked about the timing of the legislation. Director Byington responded that the property is ready to be marketed, but there is no particular rush. She explained that the Ordinance authorizes the Administration to market for sale 1472 Belle for 180 days. She further explained that the project addresses Step # 4 of the City’ s Affordable Housing Strategy, creating opportunities for low-moderate income households and aligns with the City’ s Community Vision housing goals. The project used HOME funds which require that the home be sold to a buyer at or below 80% of the Area Median Income. The maximum sale price is $209,000. Director Byington described the features of the home and offered to provide a tour to any interested members of Council. Members of the committee expressed enthusiasm for quick action to ensure that someone can get into the home as soon as possible. Chair Baker noted that the last time Council authorized the sale of property, language was added to require follow up from the Administration on a specific timeline. Director Byington voiced no objection to incorporating similar language into Ordinance 28- 2025. Motion made by Chair Baker and seconded to amend Ordinance 28-2025 to insert the following language at the end of Section 3: within 45 days of the closing on the property. All members voted in favor. Motion passed. Ord. 28-2025 amended. Motion made by Chair Baker and seconded to recommend adoption of Ord. 28-2025 as amended. All members voted in favor. Motion passed. Housing, Planning & Development Committee adjourned at 8:30 p.m. Docusign Envelope ID: FC7C8E7A- 66D0-4861-9E0B- CAD6E90E317D

5 Approved: Kyle Baker, Chair Housing, Planning, & Development Committee Maureen M. Bach, Clerk of Council 11/10/25 Docusign Envelope ID: FC7C8E7A- 66D0-4861-9E0B- CAD6E90E317D

Project / Client Logo ZPAC Meeting # 3 Zoning Districts and Use Standards Review and Discussion August 26, 2025 Meeting Purpose and Agenda Purpose Discuss and reach consensus on major proposed changes in draft Chapters: 2: Zoning District Standards 3: Use standards Agenda Project Purpose and Process Districts and Uses Major Changes Overview and Discussion Next Steps PROJECT INTRODUCTION Project Goals Align with the Community Vision 2019 Improve User- Friendliness Expand Flexibility Expand Housing Options Encourage Adaptive Reuse of Existing Structures Redevelop Underutilized Properties Enhance Accessibility Strengthen Code Enforcement Streamline Development Approval Processes Establish Objective Design and Development Standards Docusign Envelope ID: FC7C8E7A- 66D0-4861-9E0B- CAD6E90E317D

Relationship to the Community Vision- City’s Master Plan 2019 Community Vision Visionary, aspirational Policy guide for discretionary decision making Zoning Regulations Technical, detailed Rules that development and uses must follow Scope of Work Task 1: Project Initiation Task 2: Community Engagement Task 3: Existing Conditions Analysis and Preliminary Recommendations Task 4: District and Use Standards Task 5: Development, Building, and Sign Standards Task 6: Subdivision Standards, Zoning Procedures, and Definitions Task 7: Draft and Final Zoning Code DISTRICTS AND USES MAJOR CHANGES Current Base Districts Proposed Base Districts R-1L – Residential, Single Family ( Low Density) RS1 – Residential, One Dwelling Unit, Low- Density District R-1M –Residential, Single Family Medium Density) RS2 – Residential, One Dwelling Unit; Medium Density District R-1H –Residential, Single Family (High Density) RS3 – Residential, One Dwelling Unit; High Density District L – Lagoon District L – Residential, Lagoon District R2 – Residential, Single and Two Family RM1 – Residential, Mixed Housing; Low- Moderate Density District N/A RM2 – Residential, Mixed Housing; Moderate Density District ML – Residential, Multi-Family (Low Density) MH – Residential, Multi-Family (High Density) MD – Residential, Multi- Dwelling Units District C-1 –Commercial, Office C1 – Central Business District C-2 – Commercial, Retail C2 – Retail Commercial District C-3 – Commercial, General C3 – General Commercial District C-4 – Commercial, Public School Parks (not zoned currently) M –Municipal District I – Industrial District I – Industrial District PD – Planned Development PD – Major Planned Development Current vs. Proposed Base Districts Docusign Envelope ID: FC7C8E7A- 66D0-4861-9E0B- CAD6E90E317D

Current vs. Proposed Overlay Districts Current Overlay Districts Proposed Overlay Districts HPD/ HP – Historic Preservation Districts/ Historic Properties HP-O – Historic Preservation Overlay District MU-O –Mixed Use Overlay District Proposed to Eliminate N/A PD-O –Minor Planned Development N/A AR-O –Adaptive Reuse Overlay ZPAC: Majority of Mixed- Use Overlay (= Ground Floor Residential) replaced with updated use regulations, Minor PD, or Adaptive Reuse? Should all PD (major/ minor) be an overlay? Proposed Zoning Map No Major Changes Proposed to: RS1, RS2, RS3 L RM1 C1, C2, C3 I PD Major Changes Proposed to: RM2 MD M ZPAC: Madison west end from C1 to C2 Change “ Central Business District” name? Extent of new M district? RM2 District Why Propose the RM2 District? Supports higher- density housing near transit corridors ( Detroit Ave. & Madison Ave.) Promotes mixed- use development and walkability Increases housing variety and affordability Aligns with sustainable growth Encourages parking reform to reduce car dependency Map Source: Greater Cleveland RTA System Map RM2 District – All Options RM2 Option 1: covers a ½-mile buffer from transit corridors along Detroit Ave. and Madison Ave. RM2 Option 2: covers a 500-foot buffer from transit corridors along Detroit Ave. and Madison Ave. RM2 Option 3: covers a 250-foot buffer from transit corridors along Detroit Ave. and Madison Ave. Discussion Question: Which RM- 2 option do you think is most appropriate for Lakewood? ZPAC: RM2 proposal may better fit as a transit- oriented development ( TOD) overlay Docusign Envelope ID: FC7C8E7A- 66D0-4861-9E0B- CAD6E90E317D

Why Combine ML and MH into One MD District? Similar development patterns on the ground Combines districts for consistent, streamlined regulations Supports missing middle and multi- family housing MD – Residential District Residential District 1 MD – Residential District High-density residential development along the lakefront and Rocky River. Supports multi-dwelling units to enhance access to recreational, commercial, and transportation areas. Promotes compact residential development that aligns with surrounding infrastructure and neighborhood connectivity. Discussion Question: What are your thoughts on combining the ML and MH Districts to MD District? Supports expansion, renovation, and adaptive reuse of municipal and school district properties. Ensures continued functionality and growth of public facilities to meet evolving community needs. Facilitates improvements to public spaces for long-term adaptability and service efficiency. Residential District 1 M –Municipal District ZPAC: Work in progress – scope, regulations for use (parks, schools…libraries?), and process for rezoning (in/out) Current vs. Proposed Dimensional Standards Current Standards Proposed Standards Docusign Envelope ID: FC7C8E7A- 66D0-4861-9E0B- CAD6E90E317D

Proposed Dimensional Standards Lot Standards Applicability Analysis Results R1-L / RS1 District Lot Standards Applicability Analysis Results R1-M / RS2 District Lot Standards Applicability Analysis Results R1H / RS-3 District Docusign Envelope ID: FC7C8E7A- 66D0-4861-9E0B- CAD6E90E317D

Current vs. Proposed Dimensional Standards Current Standards Proposed Standards ZPAC: Discussion over support for up to 3-unit in RM1; 4-unit may be too much for this district. Proposed Dimensional Standards RM1 Proposed Dimensional Standards RM2 Proposed Dimensional Standards MD Note: Example Diagram Only Height Transitions Graphic Docusign Envelope ID: FC7C8E7A- 66D0-4861-9E0B- CAD6E90E317D

Current vs. Proposed Dimensional Standards Current Standards Proposed Standards Major Proposed Use Related Changes RS1, RS2, RS3 ( Currently R-1L, R-1M, R-1H) No major revisions proposed RM- 1 District ( Currently R2) Dwelling, Three- Unit Dwelling, Four- Unit RM- 2 District ( Proposed) Dwelling, One- Unit Dwelling, Two- Unit Limited to areas along Madison Ave. and Detroit Ave.: Dwelling, Three- Unit Dwelling, Four- Unit Dwelling, Townhome Dwelling, Multi- Unit 5–12 Units MD District ( Currently ML and MH Districts) Dwelling, Three- Unit Dwelling, Four- Unit Dwelling, Townhome Dwelling, Multi- Unit 5–12 Units Dwelling, Multi- Unit 13+ Units Dwelling, Multi- Unit Complex ZPAC: Discussion over support for up to 3-unit in RM1; 4-unit may be too much for this district. Short-term rental regulations ( pending) Allow for one, two-unit dwellings in MD Parks/ Playgrounds in RS, RM, MD? Major Proposed Use Related Changes C 1, C2, C3 Districts Dwelling, Multi- Unit; Above Ground Floor Only Dwelling, Multi- Unit; Rear Ground Floor Nursing Home Hotel Motel ( separated from Hotel) only allowed in C-3 district Pet Grooming Pet Boarding ( Only allowed in C-3) I District School, Trade/ Vocational Animal Clinic/ Hospital Bar, Tavern, Nightclub Indoor Commercial Recreation Entertainment Instruction Studio Museum/ Art Gallery Marijuana Dispensary ZPAC: Ground floor dwelling units in “C” Hotels; do we need to retain motel? Pet Boarding in “I” District Restrict Parking (Surface, Garage/ Deck) to Conditional Use? Planned Development Districts Major PD – Base District Provide opportunities for large- scale, multi-phase developments that promote creative and innovative design Allows for the development of site- specific zoning regulations in exchange for providing measurable benefits to the community, such as: affordable housing, accessible design, and environmentally sustainable development Allows for the creation of unique zoning regulations tailored to the specific needs of each development Minor PD – Overlay District Achieve high quality, creative, and innovative land planning and site design that furthers the objectives of the City, but which cannot be achieved through the strict application of Code standards Provides a process by which modifications to base district standards may be approved that meet the needs and character of the site- specific features and context of the district Docusign Envelope ID: FC7C8E7A- 66D0-4861-9E0B- CAD6E90E317D

Planned Development Districts Major PD – Base District Developer proposes all zoning standards for the development of the property Planning Commission and City Council approve the site- specific zoning standards Parcel / phase specific projects request site plan approval and building permit approval based on approved zoning standards Note: Images for Reference Only Planned Development Districts Minor PD – Overlay District Developer requests deviations from underlying zoning requirements Site Development Allowances Planning Commission and City Council approve site plan with site development allowances based on Modification Standards Environmentally Sustainable Design Affordability Accessible Design Other Building permits can be requested after approval Note: Image for Reference Only Planned Development – Major vs. Minor Applies to sites over 10,000 SF, typically large- scale or multi-phase developments Approves site-specific zoning standards Applies to Sites under 10,000 SF – context- sensitive infill Approves modifications to base district development and design standards PDs not allowed in RS Districts Reviewed and recommended by PC Reviewed and decided upon by CC MAJOR PD MINOR PDBOTH Discussion Question: Does the threshold of minor PD under 10,000 SF and major PD over 10,000 SF work well for Lakewood? ZPAC: Joint Meetings (PC/ABR) Does separating Major/ Minor improve or complicate the process? Should all PD (major/ minor) be an overlay? Adaptive Reuse Overlay (AR-O) Purpose Flexible reuse of existing buildings Allows diverse uses and modifies development standards Supports sustainable growth and revitalization Focus on areas with good transit & pedestrian access Applicability Can apply in any zoning district Docusign Envelope ID: FC7C8E7A- 66D0-4861-9E0B- CAD6E90E317D

Proposed Allowed Uses within Adaptive Reuse Overlay ( AR- O) RS1, RS2, RS3, RM1, RM2, MD: Assisted Living Facility Dwelling, Multi- Unit ( 5–12 Units) Dwelling, Multi- Unit ( 13+ Units) Child Day Care Center ( Type A) Community Service Facility Place of Worship Bed and Breakfast Establishment Meeting/ Event Establishment Museum/ Art Gallery Public Park and Playground School, Elementary School, Secondary School, Trade/ Vocational C-1, C- 2, C- 3, M, I: Assisted Living Facility; Dwelling, Multi- Unit 5–12 Units; Dwelling, Multi- Unit 13+ Units; Nursing Home; Public Park and Playground; School, Elementary; School, Secondary; and School, Trade/ Vocational ZPAC: Hotel use (C1/2/3, M)? Accessory Use Table Accessory Dwelling Unit (ADU) Standards Existing Standards to Remain One ADU per lot Allowed accessory to a single-unit dwelling Detached ADUs in rear yard Attached/ internal ADUs attached to principal dwelling Compliance with Building Code Proposed / New Standards iôèèÍèôô ôÍ Detached ADU setbacks: 10-foot from rear and interior side property lines Attached/internal ADU sizing: max 40% of principal dwelling orfull basement/attic Firewall separation requirement ZPAC: Allow (Detached) ADUs vs. more regulations? Drive-Through Standards Location Must be at the rear or interior side of the building Stacking Minimum 20 ft depth per space Lane widths: 12 ft Display Signs Max 2 signs, 80 sq ft total Max 40 sq ft/sign, 8 ft height Accessory to financial institutions only in the C-2 ZPAC: Limit high-stacking uses to C-3? Permit low-stacking uses in all C districts? Docusign Envelope ID: FC7C8E7A- 66D0-4861-9E0B- CAD6E90E317D

Solar Energy Collection System Standards Canopy- Mounted Over parking lots Fô æîô Clearance for service vehicles Ground- Mounted Follow setbacks Fô èôÍÍèô 5 ft side/ rear setback; not in easement Roof- Mounted Any roof; flush preferred Mounting equipment should match roof color Note: Example Diagrams Only ZPAC: Prohibit from front yard? Carports not in “R…” NEXT STEPS Get Involved ZPAC Members: Encourage your friends, neighbors, and network to review the draft Chapters and provide feedback via the project website Like and share upcoming social media posts about the availability of the draft Chapters for review and comment Review the draft Chapters and provide feedback via the project website! Next Steps Task 1: Project Initiation Task 2: Community Engagement Task 3: Current OrdinanceAnalysis and Preliminary Recommendations Task 4: District and Use Standards Task 5: Development, Building, and Sign Standards Task 6: Subdivision Standards, Zoning procedures, and Definitions Task 7: Draft and Final Zoning Ordinance Docusign Envelope ID: FC7C8E7A- 66D0-4861-9E0B- CAD6E90E317D

Docusign Envelope ID: FC7C8E7A-66D0-4861-9E0B-CAD6E90E317D THANK YOU

Housing, Planning, & Development Committee 10- 27- 25 19: 15 Agenda Name Comments Support Oppose Neutral Communication from Assistant Planning Director Baas regarding Lakewood Zoning Refresh Project ( 2024- 2025) - UPDATED ( Districts and Use Standards) ( Referred to HPD 9/15/ 2025) 1 0 0 1 S. ORDINANCE 18-2025 - AN ORDINANCE to take effect immediately provided it receives the affirmative vote of at least two thirds of the members of Council, or otherwise to take effect and be in force after the earliest period allowed by law, to amend Chapter 1775, Weeds, of the Codified Ordinances of the City of Lakewood for the purpose of establishing regulations for front yard plantings. ( 1st read & referred to HPD 5/19/25; 2nd reading 6/2/25) 1 0 1 0 Sentiments for All Agenda Items The following graphs display sentiments for comments that have location data. Only locations of users who have commented will be shown. Overall Sentiment Docusign Envelope ID: FC7C8E7A- 66D0-4861-9E0B- CAD6E90E317D

Agenda Item: eComments for Communication from Assistant Planning Director Baas regarding Lakewood Zoning Refresh Project ( 2024- 2025) - UPDATED ( Districts and Use Standards) ( Referred to HPD 9/15/ 2025) Overall Sentiment Hannah Hines Location: Submitted At: 6:42pm 10-27-25 My name is Hannah - I would like to to advocate for the preservation and adaptive reuse of the mid-century modern / goodie style building at 13701 Detroit Avenue which was formerly Educators Music and it seems set to be demolished, As you review updates to the Lakewood Zoning Refresh Project, including the proposed Historic Preservation and Adaptive Reuse Overlay Districts, I urge you to consider this building as a strong candidate for protection or creative reuse under these provisions. At least of the facade / materials on the front of the building. Architecturally, 13701 Detroit represents a rare example of mid-century modern design in Lakewood. a style that contributes to our city’s unique character and post-war development history. Rather than demolition, I ask the City to explore adaptive reuse pathways potentially through the AR-O overlay or a future Historic Preservation designation that would allow reinvestment while maintaining its design integrity. This approach aligns with the goals outlined in tonight’s zoning update: encouraging sustainable development, reuse of existing structures, and neighborhood compatibility. Saving and reimagining 13701 Detroit would not only preserve an important piece of our architectural heritage, but also demonstrate Lakewood’s commitment to innovation through preservation. Thank you for your time and for considering this property as part of the City’s broader vision for thoughtful development. Docusign Envelope ID: FC7C8E7A- 66D0-4861-9E0B- CAD6E90E317D

Agenda Item: eComments for S. ORDINANCE 18- 2025 - AN ORDINANCE to take effect immediately provided it receives the affirmative vote of at least two thirds of the members of Council, or otherwise to take effect and be in force after the earliest period allowed by law, to amend Chapter 1775, Weeds, of the Codified Ordinances of the City of Lakewood for the purpose of establishing regulations for front yard plantings. ( 1st read & referred to HPD 5/19/ 25; 2nd reading 6/2/25) Overall Sentiment Amy Herberger Location: Submitted At: 10:54am 10- 26- 25 OPPOSE Ordinance ORDINANCE 18- 2025- 1775 - Front Yard Plantings / Bunts Road Multi— Modal Project I strongly oppose Section 1775. 03 and the Bunts Road Multi Modal Project as a clear example of government OVERREACH. These measures interfere with homeowners lawful use of their property, imposing setback, planting restrictions, and potential encroachments on PRIVATE land. The FIFTH AMENDMENT protects citizens from governmental actions that take or diminish the use and value of private property without due process or just compensation. This ordinance raises serious constitutional concerns and risks forcing residents to surrender control of their land for projects they did not approve. Lakewood homeowners already maintain safe, attractive, and environmentally responsible properties. This ordinance opens the door to selective enforcement and unnecessary conflicts between neighbors and the city. If the City truly wants to promote ecological landscaping, it should rely of voluntary programs, education, and fair compensation, not mandates that undermine fundamental property rights. I urge Council to reject section Ordinance 18-2025 Weeds 1775.03 and the Bunts Road Multi-Modal Project as proposed, as mandating restrictions on private property sets a CONCERNING precedent and invites avoidable conflicts with residents RIGHTS. Docusign Envelope ID: FC7C8E7A- 66D0-4861-9E0B- CAD6E90E317D